|
![[ about ]](../../../images/buttons/babout.gif)

![[ concerts ]](../../../images/buttons/bconcert.gif)

![[ recordings ]](../../../images/buttons/brecordi.gif)

![[ royal court ]](../../../images/buttons/broyalco.gif)

![[ online ]](../../../images/buttons/bonline.gif)
|
 
Publication: The New York Times [US]
Date: December 2, 1981
Section:
Page Number(s):
Length:
Title: "Is Prince Leading Music to a True Biracism?"
Written By: Robert Palmer
ELVIS PRESLEY'S first national television appearances and hit records were
controversial because they challenged the conventional sexual and racial
attitudes of the mid-50's. Mr. Presley flaunted his sex appeal more flagrantly
than any white pop performer before him, and he introduced black rhythms and
inflections into the American pop mainstream, making it possible for black
rockers like Little Richard and Chuck Berry to appeal to white teen-agers
directly. Today, of course, attitudes toward race and sex tend to be
considerably more liberal. Or do they?
Prince,the 21-year-old singer, songwriter and multiinstrumentalist who is
performing tonight at the Palladium, is the most controversial contemporary rock
star precisely because he challenges sexual and racial stereotypes. The songs on
his four Warner Bros. albums explore adolescent sexuality in language explicit
enough to require warning stickers ("contains language which may be unsuitable
for some listeners"), but the stickers haven't kept his records off the
best-seller charts. And his music confounds racial categories by combining
elements of white pop and rock with black dance rhythms.
How rigid are racial categories in contemporary pop music?Princerecently
found out when theRolling Stonesinvited him to open several West Coast
concerts on their 1981 tour. The suggestions of androgyny in his fluid body
movements and flamboyantly minimal stage costume were more than a little
reminiscent of some of Mick Jagger's early performances, but the almost entirely
white Stones audience apparently failed to make the connection. They pelted
Princewith fruit and bottles, causing him to cut his sets short. Similar
reactions from white radio programmers have keptPrince'srecords off most FM
rock stations; it's the stations with black music formats that are playing them.
'Dirty Mind' Is 3d Album
Prince'smixed black-Italian parentage and his upbringing in a racially
integrated neighborhood in Minneapolis contributed to his genuinely biracial
musical approach and outlook. The fact that white rock fans and radio stations
have tended to banish him to the blackmusic ghetto says more about racism in
contemporary pop music circles than it does aboutPrince'ssongs or his
presentation. And their resistance has been crumbling;Prince'sthird Warner
Bros.album, "Dirty Mind," sold spectacularly and spawned a hit single,
"Uptown," and his latest album, "Controversy," gives every indication of
equaling and perhaps exceeding that performance.
The first single to be released from the new album is also called
"Controversy," and it is a perfectly realized fusion of black and white pop
idioms, alternating stretches of taut dance-floor funk with a more melodic,
songlike refrain. It's also a calculated bit of outrage. During the melodic
sections,Princeobserves caustically that "some people want to die so they
can be free," and over the funk sections he repeats both the Lord's Prayer and
a litany of his own: "Some people call me rude / I wish we all were nude / I
wish there was no black or white / I wish there were no rules." (Controversy
Music, Ascap) In other words, forPrince,sexual liberation is both a
political program and a religion. "Sexuality is all you'll ever need," he
maintains in another new song, "Sexuality," "just let your body be free."
Whether one agrees with this message or not, it can't be denied thatPrince
backs it up with exceptional musical talent. The labels of his four albums
proclaim that they were "produced, arranged, composed and performed by
Prince' '; except for occasional contributions from one or two members of his
touring band, the albums are one-man jobs. They certainly don't sound homemade,
unlike most albums that use similar studio trickery. The rich mesh of voices and
instruments, all provided byPrince,give the illusion that a full band is
playing, and there are enough distinctive guitar solos, keyboard riffs and drum
breaks to suggest the presence of several gifted instrumentalists.Prince
would be a talent to reckon with if he confined himself to playing guitar or
drums on other people's records.
The fact thatPrincecan do everything makes him one of the most impressive
new pop talents of the past few years. It's also the secret behind his
apparently effortless fusion of black and white pop styles. The music transcends
racial stereotyping precisely because it's almost allPrince; Princehimself
transcends racial stereotyping because, as he once put it, "I never grew up in
one particular culture." One suspects that as time goes on, more and more
American pop will reflect a similarly biracial orientation. If that's so,
Prince'sblack-white synthesis isn't just a picture of what could be, it's a
prophecy.
|